Voting groups found organically by repeated at-win co-voting consistency.
Updated Jul 7, 2026, 6:03 PMOrganic Cohorts
Consistent Co-Voting Groups
8candidate groups8strongest group size9,997signal pairs423eligible voters
This analysis uses no preloaded cohort list. It links voters who repeatedly had positive at-win votes on the same fully covered winners, then grows clusters from the strongest recurring pairs.
crimsonovoidchkcadmonkeyShaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthbluechipgrailsAldoverxAnimatedNFT
59shared winners8all-member wins80%consistency2.6%covered TDH
AEZYKillstrike6metaverseJamesAndrewTarainAbstractfercaggianoOnlyMemesErmanGulbag
50shared winners7all-member wins75%consistency1.1%covered TDH
crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthLorsbluechipgrailsSaedfreecod
57shared winners8all-member wins78%consistency1.8%covered TDH
Shaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthLorsAldoverxAnimatedNFTpobedeenfreecod
51shared winners4all-member wins76%consistency2.5%covered TDH
AEZYZokuricardotakamurafercaggianoOnlyMemesErmanGulbaguyoShaggy
41shared winners2all-member wins75%consistency1.1%covered TDH
HugoFazGhostPeppercrimsonovoidchkHet_PateljyppyAnaNovoMaxMyEthgolden618
80shared winners7all-member wins76%consistency8.6%covered TDH
HugoFazNLVcrimsonovoidchkRakeshjyppyYEKTAMaxMyEthgolden618
80shared winners7all-member wins80%consistency6.8%covered TDH
crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627YEKTAParadigmstoriesbluechipgrailsraredaemonMisoMDYSLEX
57shared winners2all-member wins79%consistency0.1%covered TDH
Strongest Pairs3+ wins / 1.2x lift
6metaverseKillstrike
3289% / 2.2x Shaggy8627YEKTA
3884% / 1.8x AEZYfercaggiano
2492% / 2.2x crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627
4289% / 1.5x bluechipgrailsMaxMyEth
2581% / 2.1x bluechipgrailsYEKTA
2787% / 1.9x cadmonkeyMaxMyEth
3182% / 1.7x BrynnAliseTarainAbstract
2172% / 2.4x JamesAndrewTarainAbstract
2172% / 2.4x bluechipgrailsShaggy8627
2787% / 1.9x 6metaverseOnlyMemes
1986% / 2.4x AEZYOnlyMemes
2091% / 2.2x Ermanraredaemon
1474% / 3.3x ErmanGulbagfercaggiano
1387% / 3.3x MaxMyEthxAnimatedNFT
1986% / 2.3x MaxMyEthShaggy8627
3079% / 1.7x Interpretation
The strongest signal is repeated co-presence at the moment a submission won, not merely one shared vote. High overlap means one voter's winning-card votes often coincide with another's; high lift means the pair appears together more often than their individual voting frequency would predict.
Treat these as candidate blocs, not accusations. The chart finds consistency in public voting behavior, but it cannot prove coordination, private communication, or whether those votes changed the final outcome.