Voting groups found organically by repeated at-win co-voting consistency.

Updated Jul 7, 2026, 6:03 PM

Organic Cohorts

Consistent Co-Voting Groups

8candidate groups8strongest group size9,997signal pairs423eligible voters

This analysis uses no preloaded cohort list. It links voters who repeatedly had positive at-win votes on the same fully covered winners, then grows clusters from the strongest recurring pairs.

Group 12,045.2
crimsonovoidchkcadmonkeyShaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthbluechipgrailsAldoverxAnimatedNFT
59shared winners8all-member wins80%consistency2.6%covered TDH
Group 21,925.4
AEZYKillstrike6metaverseJamesAndrewTarainAbstractfercaggianoOnlyMemesErmanGulbag
50shared winners7all-member wins75%consistency1.1%covered TDH
Group 31,879.4
crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthLorsbluechipgrailsSaedfreecod
57shared winners8all-member wins78%consistency1.8%covered TDH
Group 41,817.3
Shaggy8627YEKTAMaxMyEthLorsAldoverxAnimatedNFTpobedeenfreecod
51shared winners4all-member wins76%consistency2.5%covered TDH
Group 51,462.3
AEZYZokuricardotakamurafercaggianoOnlyMemesErmanGulbaguyoShaggy
41shared winners2all-member wins75%consistency1.1%covered TDH
Group 61,378.6
HugoFazGhostPeppercrimsonovoidchkHet_PateljyppyAnaNovoMaxMyEthgolden618
80shared winners7all-member wins76%consistency8.6%covered TDH
Group 71,303.6
HugoFazNLVcrimsonovoidchkRakeshjyppyYEKTAMaxMyEthgolden618
80shared winners7all-member wins80%consistency6.8%covered TDH
Group 81,233.9
crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627YEKTAParadigmstoriesbluechipgrailsraredaemonMisoMDYSLEX
57shared winners2all-member wins79%consistency0.1%covered TDH
Strongest Pairs3+ wins / 1.2x lift
6metaverseKillstrike
3289% / 2.2x
Shaggy8627YEKTA
3884% / 1.8x
AEZYfercaggiano
2492% / 2.2x
crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627
4289% / 1.5x
freecodLors
1794% / 2.9x
bluechipgrailsMaxMyEth
2581% / 2.1x
bluechipgrailsYEKTA
2787% / 1.9x
MagniMagniII
12100% / 4x
cadmonkeyMaxMyEth
3182% / 1.7x
BrynnAliseTarainAbstract
2172% / 2.4x
JamesAndrewTarainAbstract
2172% / 2.4x
bluechipgrailsShaggy8627
2787% / 1.9x
6metaverseOnlyMemes
1986% / 2.4x
AEZYOnlyMemes
2091% / 2.2x
Ermanraredaemon
1474% / 3.3x
ErmanGulbagfercaggiano
1387% / 3.3x
MaxMyEthxAnimatedNFT
1986% / 2.3x
MaxMyEthShaggy8627
3079% / 1.7x

Interpretation

The strongest signal is repeated co-presence at the moment a submission won, not merely one shared vote. High overlap means one voter's winning-card votes often coincide with another's; high lift means the pair appears together more often than their individual voting frequency would predict.

Treat these as candidate blocs, not accusations. The chart finds consistency in public voting behavior, but it cannot prove coordination, private communication, or whether those votes changed the final outcome.