Consistent Co-Voting Groups

Voting groups found organically by repeated at-win co-voting consistency.

Updated Oct 9, 2026, 4:25 PM

Organic Cohorts

Consistent Co-Voting Groups

8candidate groups8strongest group size9,823signal pairs497eligible voters

This analysis uses no preloaded cohort list. It links voters who repeatedly had positive at-win votes on the same fully covered winners, then grows clusters from the strongest recurring pairs.

Group 13,099.8

6metaverse1dontknowsfercaggianodougfriesensenemsadBadArtInternMABBicasso

85shared winners8all-member wins73%consistency0%covered TDH

#551 Permanent Pepe8/8 / 0%#538 Meme Worthy8/8 / 0%#539 the_only_cloud8/8 / 0%

Group 22,740

YEKTAcrimsonovoidchkcadmonkeyShaggy8627MaxMyEthbluechipgrailsAldoverxAnimatedNFT

64shared winners8all-member wins78%consistency1.9%covered TDH

#441 Proof of Existence8/8 / 20%#424 We Are Still Alive8/8 / 14%#426 In the Mood for Cope8/8 / 12%

Group 32,063.5

YEKTAcrimsonovoidchkShaggy8627MBStuartMaxMyEthbluechipgrailsraredaemonErman

69shared winners3all-member wins74%consistency1.4%covered TDH

#453 Collector8/8 / 1%#463 still standing8/8 / 1%#455 GM IS NOT A CRIME8/8 / 0%

Group 41,912.9

6metaverseAEZYKillstrikefercaggianoTarainAbstractJamesAndrewOnlyMemesErmanGulbag

91shared winners7all-member wins72%consistency0.8%covered TDH

#491 Just Culture8/8 / 11%#492 Pursuit of Volatility8/8 / 10%#482 An Artist's Life8/8 / 3%

Group 51,831.7

JasonOPhotoZigmarilliongrubnotTarainAbstractBrynnAliseJamesAndrewErmanGulbagpelingenc

83shared winners7all-member wins69%consistency0.4%covered TDH

#505 Freedom To Ascend8/8 / 3%#499 Network State of Mind8/8 / 1%#491 Just Culture8/8 / 1%

Group 61,828.3

6metaverseAEZYKillstrikegrubnotTarainAbstractErmanGulbagpelingencRachelSTWood

80shared winners6all-member wins75%consistency0.3%covered TDH

#478 Network for Good 8/8 / 2%#496 WAGMI Ululation8/8 / 1%#491 Just Culture8/8 / 0%

Group 71,507.7

crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627MaxMyEthbluechipgrailspapajdogAndreasPixeloushApestake

53shared winners2all-member wins85%consistency1.4%covered TDH

#441 Proof of Existence8/8 / 12%#436 Hide8/8 / 8%#434 Can You Still Tell?7/8 / 12%

Group 81,240.3

AEZYKillstrikealexisolinartsimounseenarteDewucmeuyoMaryamhasaniart

57shared winners1all-member wins70%consistency0%covered TDH

#495 Permissionless Crossing8/8 / 0%#521 When The World is Destroyed7/8 / 0%#499 Network State of Mind7/8 / 0%

Strongest Pairs3+ wins / 1.2x lift

1dontknowssenemsad

4692% / 2x

crimsonovoidchkShaggy8627

4289% / 2x

1dontknowsBicasso

3991% / 2x

MagniMagniII

18100% / 4.1x

1dontknowsdougfriesen

4483% / 1.8x

1dontknowsBadArtIntern

4284% / 1.8x

bluechipgrailsShaggy8627

2787% / 2.6x

BadArtInterndougfriesen

3876% / 2x

desolalasisisenemsad

23100% / 2.8x

bluechipgrailsMaxMyEth

2581% / 2.8x

MoonZoeySoliiiart

2377% / 3.1x

MABsenemsad

3476% / 2.1x

Cuttlesenemsad

22100% / 2.8x

Bicassosenemsad

3377% / 2.1x

pandelicsenemsad

4080% / 1.8x

cadmonkeyMaxMyEth

3278% / 2.1x

Ebrahim_ElmiSoliiiart

1594% / 4.4x

hexumShaggy8627

2292% / 2.7x

Interpretation

The strongest signal is repeated co-presence at the moment a submission won, not merely one shared vote. High overlap means one voter's winning-card votes often coincide with another's; high lift means the pair appears together more often than their individual voting frequency would predict.

Treat these as candidate blocs, not accusations. The chart finds consistency in public voting behavior, but it cannot prove coordination, private communication, or whether those votes changed the final outcome.