Maybe/Ruskin and Council voting footprint across covered winning cards.

Updated Oct 10, 2026, 12:19 AM

Cohort Impact

Breadth vs Leverage

5.8xCouncil at-win TDH vs Maybe/Ruskin139 / 140Council-touched covered winners8Maybe + Ruskin both-voted winners67 vs 1320%+ share cases

This view uses fully covered winners only. It compares cohort breadth, at-win TDH, and share of each winner's total TDH.

Cards touched
24
139
Threshold hits
8
96
At-win TDH
316.8M
1.8B
20%+ leverage
13
67
Share of covered TDH
4%
21%
Maybe + RuskinCouncil
VoterCardsAt-Win TDH
David106484.4M
Blocknoob93399.3M
Giopetto77348.2M
ruskin16299.6M
HugoFaz104213.8M
Arsonic49204.2M
RegularDad118107.1M
OnlyMemes2267.6M
maybe1617.2M

Interpretation

Council shows the broader aggregate voting footprint across covered winners: it touched 139 of 140 winners and supplied 20.7% of covered at-win TDH, compared with 3.6% for Maybe/Ruskin.

Maybe/Ruskin support is more concentrated. Both handles appear together on 8 winners, while Council clears the 4+ voter threshold on 96 winners and has 67 cases above 20% of a winner's TDH versus 13 for Maybe/Ruskin. This is evidence of voting footprint, not proof of what would have happened without either cohort.