Maybe/Ruskin and Council voting footprint across covered winning cards.

Updated Aug 23, 2026, 4:42 PM

Cohort Impact

Breadth vs Leverage

6.4xCouncil at-win TDH vs Maybe/Ruskin97 / 119Council-touched covered winners4Maybe + Ruskin both-voted winners41 vs 820%+ share cases

This view uses fully covered winners only. It compares cohort breadth, at-win TDH, and share of each winner's total TDH.

Cards touched
16
97
Threshold hits
4
68
At-win TDH
186.7M
1.2B
20%+ leverage
8
41
Share of covered TDH
2%
16%
Maybe + RuskinCouncil
VoterCardsAt-Win TDH
Blocknoob63266.6M
David64263.2M
Giopetto56244M
ruskin10176.9M
HugoFaz78145.1M
Arsonic33127.7M
RegularDad8274.3M
OnlyMemes2267.5M
maybe109.8M

Interpretation

Council shows the broader aggregate voting footprint across covered winners: it touched 97 of 119 winners and supplied 15.8% of covered at-win TDH, compared with 2.5% for Maybe/Ruskin.

Maybe/Ruskin support is more concentrated. Both handles appear together on 4 winners, while Council clears the 4+ voter threshold on 68 winners and has 41 cases above 20% of a winner's TDH versus 8 for Maybe/Ruskin. This is evidence of voting footprint, not proof of what would have happened without either cohort.